3 Persistent clone Patek Philippe and replica Rolex Myths
Certain watch brands have transcended their role as mere watches and are now considered prestigious investments. Brands like Patek Philippe and replica Rolex have become objects of fascination, with rumors and myths swirling around them. The value of these watches is often fueled by their supposed connections to famous figures or historical events, driving up their prices. However, not all of these legends stand up to scrutiny. 
Myth 1: Nicolas Sarkozy Hid His Patek Philippe to Avoid the Public
In 2007, French President Nicolas Sarkozy came under scrutiny for his lavish tastes, particularly after his post-election dinner at Fouquet’s in Paris. Critics labeled him as the “bling-bling” president, accusing him of flaunting wealth. A key moment in this controversy occurred during a rally when Sarkozy appeared to remove his Patek Philippe watch while shaking hands with supporters, a gesture that sparked rumors of his distrust in the public.
However, this myth is based on a misinterpretation. A closer look at the video reveals that Sarkozy’s watch strap had become loosened – likely due to a pickpocketing technique used by a nearby individual who had placed their thumb on the replica watch crystal. As a result, Sarkozy instinctively pulled his wrist away to prevent theft, but the watch remained in his possession. This explanation debunks the claim that he was trying to hide his luxury watch from the public.
Myth 2: The “Mirbat Nine” Gold Khanjar Rolex Sea-Dwellers
Another popular myth involves the Sultan of Oman supposedly awarding special Rolex Sea-Dwellers with gold khanjars to British SAS soldiers who fought in the 1972 Battle of Mirbat. This story, though often cited, is based more on conjecture than fact. 
The myth began with an article on Daniel Bourn’s Vintage-DB website, which speculated that these Sea-Dwellers could have been awarded to the SAS for their role in the battle. However, there is no solid evidence to support this. In fact, multiple sources, including Phillips Auction and former SAS soldiers, have stated that no such watches were given to the soldiers. This myth has been perpetuated by collectors and auction houses who cite the speculative story to increase the value of these watches.
Despite the lack of evidence, the story gained traction through various media outlets, creating a self-fulfilling cycle. The myth continues to influence watch prices, but without any concrete proof of the Sea-Dwellers’ association with the SAS, it remains just that – a myth.
Myth 3: Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay Wore Rolex replica Watches on Everest
One of the most enduring myths in the watch world is that Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay wore Rolex watches when they summited Mount Everest in 1953. While it’s true that Rolex provided watches to the 1953 British Everest expedition, the story about Hillary and Norgay wearing them at the summit is not supported by facts.
Rolex supplied Oyster Perpetuals, but these were not the Explorer models we associate with the brand today. The Explorer had not yet been released. Furthermore, there is no definitive evidence that either Hillary or Norgay wore a Rolex at the summit. A letter from Smiths fake Watches, which supplied equipment to the expedition, clearly states that Hillary wore a Smiths Deluxe to the top, not a Rolex. 
Rolex’s advertising campaign after the expedition, which implied its watches reached the summit, has been widely criticized. It wasn’t until later that the brand’s Explorer model was associated with the Everest ascent, despite the fact that no Rolex watches actually made it to the top. The true story of the watches worn on Everest is far less glamorous, and the myth of Rolex’s involvement remains just that – an unfounded claim.
The myths surrounding clone Rolex and Patek Philippe watches are a testament to the power of storytelling in the world of horology. These brands are often linked to prestigious events or figures, but as we’ve seen, not all of these associations are based on fact. As collectors, it’s important to approach these stories with a healthy dose of skepticism and appreciate the real history behind these iconic watches.